Sunday, August 24, 2008

OBAMA FIRST MAJOR VICTORY IS BIDEN

8/24/2008 9:40:58 PM

The question is why was Hillary teaming up with B. Hussein to win this coming election and what sneaky mischievous endeavor did they have in the witches brew. What is going on in America which caused a surge in not only infidelity but also bad judgment and nearing rebel yell angry political persuasions?

If anybody has not noticed, the high tech boom produced a record amount of millionaires while the clicks and bricks virtual world threw on the B2B victim list a consolidation of enterprises. The iconology went global and high tech enabled vast reaches and markets. Furthermore, the traditional of business had to be scrapped for the incredible investments and new millionaire high tech booms. The economy turned against the left wing and this focus on labor.

Metropolitan areas are no longer needed. The online world put an end to this. With the jobs moving to more competitive areas, shifting overseas, vast labor disputes unsinkable, and the city landscape dilapidated; the economy of scale focused on fiscal debt and implosion. The urban landscape is imploding.

What is happening with this implosion? Jobs are lost and people move. People move to find employment and property and business areas loose their merit. With a scattered population social services and organizations must consolidate if they are competitive. Social problems exceed the capacity and cost to keep them running. Now the urban leaders rise taxes to compensate and it causes more problems and a backwash.

Schools are shut down. Police departments are inefficient and scattered. Public transportation is not used. People become older and sicker but the base of paying or growing economies cannot support the system and health care, the most expensive of all the cost begins to be an issue.

Mostly, it is the closing of hospitals. The increase in cost of medical care and the increasing in paying patients or the overall lack of satisfaction in the job for medical professionals; hence, the scramble to find a more secure neighborhood to provide medical care for.

Essentially, the Democrats wanted health care and universal health care to offset this implosion before the hospitals close down or becomes a preventive failure. People do not eat healthy, they do not exercise, and they do not make efforts to cure that traditional ways of ridding this lack of health care worry.

In this urban landscape, hospitals are the first to suffer because they operate at such high costs. Without subsidies or some way to compete in an uncompetitive environment, they go out of business and this introduces the idea of subsidized or socialized health care.

Hillary Clinton was running on this idea and it was struck down by the idea that either health care was going to be destroyed or social security. Health care as the GAO has coincidently identified runs parallel to retirement benefits. People live longer but they are also less healthy now. Good or excellent health care does not change their overall health; it prolongs their life instead.

The Clintons were struck down by this dilemma and the increasing idea they would sacrifice social security and a rush to judgment. They had two plans which had already failed but were counting on a third one to win the election and to set into law socialized medicine.

That is part of the dilemma within the medical field to never turn a patient away but it is becoming an ever increasing way to cut cost and produce a profit. The reason being that as the urban landscape is thinning out, hospitals do not have the same capacity levels and must close or shrink its staff.

The Democrat and Clinton surge for socialized medicine was struck down and deemed a failure which they knew their election victory was going to be a farce and unbeatable. You have to fix social security before you begin to address the medical problem or you have to figure out why people are less healthy but living longer and more lazy.

It will end up the same answers. Socialism does not work and even if you have standards and a civilized human being, you must work harder and harder just to keep the machinery working efficiently. The idea is socialism is a resting point to make life more or less culpable to the economic climate and forces and this is where the fundamental problems lie.

You simply cannot continue on a course of socialism while using debt to finance an already tremendous crisis and you will never fix something which is permanently broken or so inefficient it will never work right. That is the problem with socialism and communism to begin with and as we know already; to fix the human condition does not take one cent. What it does take is the market to correct and we are witnessing this correction and there is not a damn thing we, they or anybody can do about it. It is just a disaster from the minds of a jackass.

On that note, if you look at the bankrolling of the political candidates, they seem to hedge all of their bets. George Sorros supports both McCain and Obama while neglecting Hillary which tells the political chicken bones the oracle is heavily weighted for Hillary. Now Soros is confused and it will be a toss up to figure out who will produce for him. Stock pickers never address a good buy and what they truly want. Therefore, when you play with these big money people, they do not think like military strategist or a tactical commando who knows how the battlefield works and can change it in an instant. They are all just playing Gods with real life Gods and it will be a mistake they will never recover from.

Biden, the conservative expert rambler, has been filling the airwaves for the past 12 months while Hillary has opted to run a platform which was so shot up it was bound to fail. The only way was to ride the coat tails of Obama who saw her as waiting to use the race card for her own political agenda which had no measure of success. Either Obama was going to look stupid for being used so badly or he was going to choose Biden who survived years of rational oratory rambling but never getting anywhere.

He is viewed as moralistic and wishing to talk things out simply because he never gets anywhere and delivers endless speeches of abstract legal thought but never clear and concise victory. Biden cannot jump the gun or sucker punch if he is always trying to talk for hours on end about nothing. They call it experience and “heavyweight experience” of goliath understanding.

It goes back to this idea of God. God asks clear questions. God does not care and he would rather have people suffer than betray him. He does not shoot inadvertently unless the person can prove it was him. However, when the facts and the truth present a clear understand and need to shoot, it is he against the human who waits for the last minute before leveling his wrath. You can talk all day long about shooting or not but when that wrath unleashes; there will be no talk and no oratory expertise to describe it better than Biden can.

That is the problem with Biden, he wants to talk about God’s wrath and how the human delays or ignores the warnings and he is skilled and seasoned enough to do these days on end and sound intelligent. But when it hits and the storm is on, oratory speech is worthless and only soothes those who wish to listen.

Well, is this just Biden’s problem or the entire dilemma with all the candidates who come from the same church and look all the same and talk all the same while trying to achieve all the same goals with a slight difference, one or two may be a point or two ahead of the other but closing in fast in what appears to be a wheelchair race. Nowadays, it is becoming increasingly difficult to tell who is who and why they all look alike and this applies to McCain, Obama, Biden, Romney, or even the Clintons. They are only a few points ahead of the other and cannot take that leap of faith to the other side we are on.

Whatever change, hope or audacity Obama has in store, Biden will serve it up with endless rambling and oratory which we know has given him over 35 years of stamina and political survival. Quite a clever move if you ask us and so far his best political decision.

No comments: