12/1/2008 11:02:32 AM
This nation is in major trouble. They are going to run up and butt head furiously for the first 12 months. The fight will be quick and I know it is coming. I warned about this but let it be for the record, this nation is in serious trouble. They are spearheading a defense and attack via legal means. There will be either a coup or some oppressive thrust legally. Be forewarned and be warned, they will not succeed if they are promoting terror and conflict with no accountability. Words are cheap now a days and trust is almost worthless. There is no trust between governments, none. Trust must be restored in 12 months that is the deadline and warning. This kidnapping is not going to be ignored.
NOTE: GLOBAL TERROR REPORT BEING PRODUCED NOW: INTEL IS COMING IN STIL.
Monday, December 1, 2008
Tuesday, November 25, 2008
WHERE HAVE WE SEEN THIS BEFORE? WHO IS WHO: ATTACK WHO, BLAME WHO, SYMBOLIC WHO?
Alinsky taught that in order to most effectively cast themselves as defenders of moral principals and human decency, organizers must react with “shock, horror, and moral outrage” whenever their targeted enemy in any way misspeaks or fails to live up to his “book of rules.”[78] Moreover, said Alinsky, whenever possible the organizer must deride his enemy and dismiss him as someone unworthy of being taken seriously because he is either intellectually deficient or morally bankrupt. “The enemy properly goaded and guided in his reaction will be your major strength,” said Alinsky.[79] He advised organizers to “laugh at the enemy” in an effort to provoke “an irrational anger.”[80] “Ridicule,” said Alinsky, “is man’s most potent weapon. It is almost impossible to counterattack ridicule. Also it infuriates the opposition, who then react to your advantage.”[81] According to Alinsky, it was vital that organizers focus on multiple crusades and multiple approaches. “A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag,” he wrote. “Man can sustain militant interest in any issue for only a limited time … New issues and crises are always developing…”[82] “Keep the pressure on,” he continued, “with different tactics and actions, and utilize all events of the period for your purpose.”[83] Toward this end, Alinsky advised organizers to be sure that they always kept more than one “fight in the bank.” In other words, organizers should keep a stockpile of comparatively small crusades which they are already prepared to conduct, and to which they can instantly turn their attention after having won a major victory of some type. These “fights in the bank” serve the dual purpose of keeping the organization’s momentum going, while not allowing its major crusade to get “stale” from excessive public exposure.[84] . - A Guide to the Political Left: Saul Alinsky, John Perazzo, April 2008, www.DiscoverTheNetwork.org -
But it is not enough for the organizer to be in solidarity with the people. He must also, said Alinsky, cultivate unity against a clearly identifiable enemy; he must specifically name this foe, and “single out” [44] precisely who is to blame for the “particular evil” that is the source of the people’s angst.[45] In other words, there must be a face associated with the people’s discontent. That face, Alinsky taught, “Must be a personification, not something general and abstract like a corporation or City Hall.”[46] Rather, it should be an individual such as a CEO, a mayor, or a president. Alinsky summarized it this way: “Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it…. [T]here is no point to tactics unless one has a target upon which to center the attacks.”[47] He held that the organizer’s task was to cultivate in people’s hearts a negative, visceral emotional response to the face of the enemy. “The organizer who forgets the significance of personal identification,” said Alinsky, “will attempt to answer all objections on the basis of logic and merit. With few exceptions this is a futile procedure.”[48] . - A Guide to the Political Left: Saul Alinsky, John Perazzo, April 2008, www.DiscoverTheNetwork.org -
Alinsky also advised organizers to focus their attention on a small number of selected, strategic targets. Spreading an organization’s passions too thinly was a recipe for certain failure, he warned.[49] Alinsky advised the radical activist to avoid the temptation to concede that his opponent was not “100 per cent devil,” or that he possessed certain admirable qualities such as being “a good churchgoing man, generous to charity, and a good husband.” Such qualifying remarks, Alinsky said, “Dilut[e] the impact of the attack” and amount to sheer “political idiocy.”[50] Alinsky stressed the need for organizers to convince their followers that the chasm between the enemy and the members of the People’s Organization was vast and unbridgeable. “Before men can act,” he said, “an issue must be polarized. Men will act when they are convinced their cause is 100 percent on the side of the angels, and that the oppositions are 100 percent on the side of the devil.”[51] Alinsky advised this course of action even though he well understood that the organizer “knows that when the time comes for negotiations it is really only a 10 percent difference.”[52] But in Lewinsky’s brand of social warfare, the ends (in this case, the transfer of power) justify virtually whatever means are required (in this case, lying).[53] . - A Guide to the Political Left: Saul Alinsky, John Perazzo, April 2008, www.DiscoverTheNetwork.org -
But it is not enough for the organizer to be in solidarity with the people. He must also, said Alinsky, cultivate unity against a clearly identifiable enemy; he must specifically name this foe, and “single out” [44] precisely who is to blame for the “particular evil” that is the source of the people’s angst.[45] In other words, there must be a face associated with the people’s discontent. That face, Alinsky taught, “Must be a personification, not something general and abstract like a corporation or City Hall.”[46] Rather, it should be an individual such as a CEO, a mayor, or a president. Alinsky summarized it this way: “Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it…. [T]here is no point to tactics unless one has a target upon which to center the attacks.”[47] He held that the organizer’s task was to cultivate in people’s hearts a negative, visceral emotional response to the face of the enemy. “The organizer who forgets the significance of personal identification,” said Alinsky, “will attempt to answer all objections on the basis of logic and merit. With few exceptions this is a futile procedure.”[48] . - A Guide to the Political Left: Saul Alinsky, John Perazzo, April 2008, www.DiscoverTheNetwork.org
Alinsky also advised organizers to focus their attention on a small number of selected, strategic targets. Spreading an organization’s passions too thinly was a recipe for certain failure, he warned.[49] Alinsky advised the radical activist to avoid the temptation to concede that his opponent was not “100 per cent devil,” or that he possessed certain admirable qualities such as being “a good churchgoing man, generous to charity, and a good husband.” Such qualifying remarks, Alinsky said, “Dilut[e] the impact of the attack” and amount to sheer “political idiocy.”[50] Alinsky stressed the need for organizers to convince their followers that the chasm between the enemy and the members of the People’s Organization was vast and unbridgeable. “Before men can act,” he said, “an issue must be polarized. Men will act when they are convinced their cause is 100 percent on the side of the angels, and that the oppositions are 100 percent on the side of the devil.”[51] Alinsky advised this course of action even though he well understood that the organizer “knows that when the time comes for negotiations it is really only a 10 percent difference.”[52] But in Lewinsky’s brand of social warfare, the ends (in this case, the transfer of power) justify virtually whatever means are required (in this case, lying).[53] . - A Guide to the Political Left: Saul Alinsky, John Perazzo, April 2008, www.DiscoverTheNetwork.org
Friday, October 3, 2008
PICTURES OF ANN AND I: VERY RARE BC WE NEVER TAKE ANY PICTURES! NEVER...
10/3/2008 5:47:16 AM
Ann always looks like every girl I have had in my life from high school sweethearts (ORIGINAL), roomates, dates, colleagues, etc... So the pictures are near identical to Ann through the years.
DESKTOP WALLPAPER OF ANN COULTER:
ME BACK IN 1989 BACK FROM OCEAN CITY, MD ON MOTORCYCLE:
AFTER COMA: BODY CAME BACK ONLY 60% OF WHAT IT WAS NEAR PERFECT! CUTS AND STRIATIONS DID NOT RETURN AFTER COMA AND PRISON. APPEARANCE AND GENERAL HEALTH ALSO DECLINED.
TRUST ME, ANN IS NOT INTERESTED ONE BIT IN ANY MAN:
Ann always looks like every girl I have had in my life from high school sweethearts (ORIGINAL), roomates, dates, colleagues, etc... So the pictures are near identical to Ann through the years.
DESKTOP WALLPAPER OF ANN COULTER:
ME BACK IN 1989 BACK FROM OCEAN CITY, MD ON MOTORCYCLE:
AFTER COMA: BODY CAME BACK ONLY 60% OF WHAT IT WAS NEAR PERFECT! CUTS AND STRIATIONS DID NOT RETURN AFTER COMA AND PRISON. APPEARANCE AND GENERAL HEALTH ALSO DECLINED.
TRUST ME, ANN IS NOT INTERESTED ONE BIT IN ANY MAN:
Monday, September 29, 2008
ANN START ATTACKING SEAN AND RUSH AND CUT ALL COMMUNICATIONS WITH THEM - THEY ARE TOO WHACKED AND DERANGED TO CARE...
9/29/2008 5:12:27 PM
Ann, Limbaugh is downright nuts and is trying hard to use you by force to get in or be a mole. He is targeting you as I was and I know them well. Don't play their game, it is too dangerous. I have observed and know them too well. They are a mole and you are being used for this, understand? Same shit with me and who it is linked to. Do not push it and make it worse; the FBI is shocked already. Now do you understand why you are a POW or a prisoner or why your emails are being read and me?
Ann, I am going to feed you Intel and I need you to act on this okay. No more debacles. Obama is the protector and messiah for the church of liberals. The reason why they are so interested in you and our love life is because you have a ticket on a nuclear sub. The reason Limbaugh wants you as a spouse is because he is number 1 and if he fails he wants number 2 to have a chance. They will use you to get in. They know I am in and Limbaugh is well aware and has stated this clearly, regardless, he still thinks he can use you to overpower or number 2 to get in tight with you as a mole. Here is what I want you to do.
You stay focused. I have our back. I want you to cut off all communications and relation with Limbaugh and Sean or Maher. Go on the attack and make them come out of hiding. They know you can get in and was bargaining with your head as if they did not know, they know. What they do not know is you are physic. I want you to use your power and begin to get in their minds. Double check with me when you find it or send the file to me telepathically and remote view cast tonight when we are in bed. (Note: Ann has special powers and I do also but I am her big brother and protector in this world, this is how we are connected). I need a target Ann, find that target babe; I have stirred their roost.
The people upstairs said “shut up” today with the block on the book of your love life. Obama announced this over the weekend (Obama asked Missouri authorities to crack down on false advertisement). Rush is linked to the people upstairs positive. They are close to the Clintons and the unions 100%. They do not get crazy or stomp when we talk about sex or love, only Rush or your deranged stalker and fan. Rush said I was told to stay away from you so they are targeting you and my book on your love life hit them hard today. Attack Limbaugh to see if he fights you or overpowers your wishes, do the same to Sean. Hillary and Bill is not interested in sex with you, trust me. Limbaugh in your life or Sean would make a great addition to their church and Obama is their protector. Limbaugh attacks at the same time they do. They think they got a chance with you but I want to know how deranged and psychotic they are when you read their mind. It is okay sweetheart, I have your back, and they are just in the way. It is huge Ann, attack them; you will not reason with them either so give up on this okay, do not ignore them.
You are dealing with very sick individuals who the FBI is shocked with right now. This is not loved stalking, this is dangerous. I need you to attack Limbaugh and Sean and I will confront them; Obama is their protector of the church so that links all of them and why Obama girl and Hollywood hottie crush. They want to use your life and buy into it. Everybody knows Limbaugh is protecting the Clintons and he is linked to the unions, your family and my family’s arch enemies. They are also anti Vietnam. Whey do you think they would stalk either you or I for marriage, sex, or otherwise? They have failed, do not push it and cut off all communications with them. Don’t act like peppy le peu, get in their face and tell them fuck you and put them in their place, I want to see their reaction. Get in their minds Ann and tell me what that pea head is up to.
LIMBAUGH has intel on how you and I... whether or not we are meeting up on the weekends, etc... He said a very sexual thing only if he was watching us in bed. Limbaugh is watching you and me okay. It is confirmed. Did he blackmail you or threaten you with pictures or some spy cam shit? He is trying to watch me and you sexually. He is a fat sick bastard and he feels he runs the country.
Cyber Warfare HQ
Ann, Limbaugh is downright nuts and is trying hard to use you by force to get in or be a mole. He is targeting you as I was and I know them well. Don't play their game, it is too dangerous. I have observed and know them too well. They are a mole and you are being used for this, understand? Same shit with me and who it is linked to. Do not push it and make it worse; the FBI is shocked already. Now do you understand why you are a POW or a prisoner or why your emails are being read and me?
Ann, I am going to feed you Intel and I need you to act on this okay. No more debacles. Obama is the protector and messiah for the church of liberals. The reason why they are so interested in you and our love life is because you have a ticket on a nuclear sub. The reason Limbaugh wants you as a spouse is because he is number 1 and if he fails he wants number 2 to have a chance. They will use you to get in. They know I am in and Limbaugh is well aware and has stated this clearly, regardless, he still thinks he can use you to overpower or number 2 to get in tight with you as a mole. Here is what I want you to do.
You stay focused. I have our back. I want you to cut off all communications and relation with Limbaugh and Sean or Maher. Go on the attack and make them come out of hiding. They know you can get in and was bargaining with your head as if they did not know, they know. What they do not know is you are physic. I want you to use your power and begin to get in their minds. Double check with me when you find it or send the file to me telepathically and remote view cast tonight when we are in bed. (Note: Ann has special powers and I do also but I am her big brother and protector in this world, this is how we are connected). I need a target Ann, find that target babe; I have stirred their roost.
The people upstairs said “shut up” today with the block on the book of your love life. Obama announced this over the weekend (Obama asked Missouri authorities to crack down on false advertisement). Rush is linked to the people upstairs positive. They are close to the Clintons and the unions 100%. They do not get crazy or stomp when we talk about sex or love, only Rush or your deranged stalker and fan. Rush said I was told to stay away from you so they are targeting you and my book on your love life hit them hard today. Attack Limbaugh to see if he fights you or overpowers your wishes, do the same to Sean. Hillary and Bill is not interested in sex with you, trust me. Limbaugh in your life or Sean would make a great addition to their church and Obama is their protector. Limbaugh attacks at the same time they do. They think they got a chance with you but I want to know how deranged and psychotic they are when you read their mind. It is okay sweetheart, I have your back, and they are just in the way. It is huge Ann, attack them; you will not reason with them either so give up on this okay, do not ignore them.
You are dealing with very sick individuals who the FBI is shocked with right now. This is not loved stalking, this is dangerous. I need you to attack Limbaugh and Sean and I will confront them; Obama is their protector of the church so that links all of them and why Obama girl and Hollywood hottie crush. They want to use your life and buy into it. Everybody knows Limbaugh is protecting the Clintons and he is linked to the unions, your family and my family’s arch enemies. They are also anti Vietnam. Whey do you think they would stalk either you or I for marriage, sex, or otherwise? They have failed, do not push it and cut off all communications with them. Don’t act like peppy le peu, get in their face and tell them fuck you and put them in their place, I want to see their reaction. Get in their minds Ann and tell me what that pea head is up to.
LIMBAUGH has intel on how you and I... whether or not we are meeting up on the weekends, etc... He said a very sexual thing only if he was watching us in bed. Limbaugh is watching you and me okay. It is confirmed. Did he blackmail you or threaten you with pictures or some spy cam shit? He is trying to watch me and you sexually. He is a fat sick bastard and he feels he runs the country.
Cyber Warfare HQ
Friday, September 12, 2008
SECOND LETTER TO WIKIPEDIA: NOT SO NICE AND UNDERSTANDING
I AM REPRESENTING ANN COULTER AT THIS TIME ON WIKIPEDIA
AddFriday, September 12, 2008 8:39:52 PM
To:info-en-q@wikimedia.org
You are being notified that the article on Ann Coulter was written by a poltical operative and is not accurate. The part that is not accurate is the following:
Entire article:
Please refer to this web page and subsequent book which has not been published and is currently being written about the life and work of Ann Coulter:
Here is your version which is unverifiable and a smear. Note upon this notice, any further calculating political rumors printed with the intent of malice will be upon notice corrected as "slander." I am her boyfriend of 20 years and her lifelong partner. You will need your lawyers to read this and remove her entry immediately or else her next email to you will be for slander.
The definition of slander is as follows. Upon notice or falsity or controversy which cannot or has not been proven, the furtherance of rumor or error is made or used in a manner to invoke injury or business loss. All that must be proved is first falsity and second loss of business or injury. Libel is the same but applies to tort law.
You will find all the information you will need to correct the "slander" or controversial entry on Ann Coulter. TWO COPIES OF BIOGRAPHY SENT.
Right now both Ann and are buried in federal legal cases. Buried. What is one more on Wikipedia. Ask yourself if you want this also? It is best to remove her entry or correct it. You have all the information here and your lawyers can also read what the entire world is reading. This is being broadcasting all over the world and you are looking very bad. I am her boyfriend and partner and I am coming to her aid and defending her even though I am mortally wounded and have been dispatched by the military. You can add that to the entry and how I had to defend her name and honor. We are on a critical mission. Take it off now or correct it. Everybody is talking about it and asking why I do not write her new entry.
BIOGRAPHY SENT AND TWO COPIES.
AddFriday, September 12, 2008 8:39:52 PM
To:info-en-q@wikimedia.org
You are being notified that the article on Ann Coulter was written by a poltical operative and is not accurate. The part that is not accurate is the following:
Entire article:
Please refer to this web page and subsequent book which has not been published and is currently being written about the life and work of Ann Coulter:
Here is your version which is unverifiable and a smear. Note upon this notice, any further calculating political rumors printed with the intent of malice will be upon notice corrected as "slander." I am her boyfriend of 20 years and her lifelong partner. You will need your lawyers to read this and remove her entry immediately or else her next email to you will be for slander.
The definition of slander is as follows. Upon notice or falsity or controversy which cannot or has not been proven, the furtherance of rumor or error is made or used in a manner to invoke injury or business loss. All that must be proved is first falsity and second loss of business or injury. Libel is the same but applies to tort law.
You will find all the information you will need to correct the "slander" or controversial entry on Ann Coulter. TWO COPIES OF BIOGRAPHY SENT.
Right now both Ann and are buried in federal legal cases. Buried. What is one more on Wikipedia. Ask yourself if you want this also? It is best to remove her entry or correct it. You have all the information here and your lawyers can also read what the entire world is reading. This is being broadcasting all over the world and you are looking very bad. I am her boyfriend and partner and I am coming to her aid and defending her even though I am mortally wounded and have been dispatched by the military. You can add that to the entry and how I had to defend her name and honor. We are on a critical mission. Take it off now or correct it. Everybody is talking about it and asking why I do not write her new entry.
BIOGRAPHY SENT AND TWO COPIES.
LETTER TO WIKIPEDIA 1: TWO COPIES SENT
PLEASE READ UP ON BIOGRAPHY OF ANN COULTER
[Chat now] paranoia <@yahoo.com>
[Chat now] paranoia <@yahoo.com>
AddFriday, September 12, 2008 8:45:06 PM
To:info-en-q@wikimedia.org
Your entry is completely false and is slander. Please revise it or remove it immediately. It is impossible to correct it myself or submit an "edit" correction or explanation. You took this function off your site.
Please make the appropriate correction on the biography of Ann Coulter and her entry. I am her boyfriend and fiance of 20 years and cleaning up the slander and political mess her enemies and the communist have attacked us and this nation with.
Thank you for your understanding and cooperation.
TWO COPIES OF BIOGRAPHY SENT TO WIKIPEDIA STAFF.
[Chat now] paranoia <@yahoo.com>
[Chat now] paranoia <@yahoo.com>
AddFriday, September 12, 2008 8:45:06 PM
To:info-en-q@wikimedia.org
Your entry is completely false and is slander. Please revise it or remove it immediately. It is impossible to correct it myself or submit an "edit" correction or explanation. You took this function off your site.
Please make the appropriate correction on the biography of Ann Coulter and her entry. I am her boyfriend and fiance of 20 years and cleaning up the slander and political mess her enemies and the communist have attacked us and this nation with.
Thank you for your understanding and cooperation.
TWO COPIES OF BIOGRAPHY SENT TO WIKIPEDIA STAFF.
Monday, August 25, 2008
ON POLITICO.COM (A DOUBLE GAG AND AN ATTEMPT AGAIN TO SHUT US UP AND LIE SOME MORE)
ALEX AND ANN WAR ON POLITICO.COM (CANNOT TELL WHO IS HITTING OR IF RUSH LIMBAUGH IS BEHIND IT – DO A SEARCH ON POLITICO.COM ON RUSH’S WEB SITE OR WHO HOW DEACTIVATIONS IS BEHIND 32 ACCOUT). AGAIN, RUSH LIES AND LIED ABOUT STALKING ANN AND ALEX… OR WERE THE LIBERALS JUST RIDDING HIS COAT TAILS AND DOING HIS DIRTY WORK? HERE ARE THE EXACHAGES BETWEEN ANN AND ALEX AND POLITICO.COM AND THE PEOPLE DOING THE STALKING AND DIRTY WORK. (NOTE: ANN IS NO LONGER ON THAT SITE AND KNOWS WHAT THE PROBLEM IS AND WHO IS UNLEASHING WHITE SUPREMIST GROUPS TO CATER SYMPATHY FOR OBAMA? RUSH AND HIS LITTLE WEAKLING NETWORK WHO DO HIS DIRTY WORK)
Rush; are you a gateway to liberalism, corruption, communism, secret white supremacy, and a world of hate filled problems of this world? A yes or no will be fine! No need to defend the Pope behind enemy lines. This monolith used the race card to humiliate me and the race card to produce a high priestess and they did not even know they were dealing with psychos and commandoes and how they were trespassing on our mission. So now, you do not want to get out of our mission and want to stay behind enemy lines? What now? Either you play a mission card or try to grab ours; can you take ours or did you already fail so many times already?
Why do you feel Ann does the dirty work for me or why do you refuse to believe I do the dirty work for her? Why? How did you come up with that doozy after so many people are trying to figure out what is going on? This is not about us, it is about them, and do you get it? Who is them and who does their dirty work?
#81
Aug. 19, 2008 - 4:37 PM EST updated
My, my, my, what a grumpy little man you are! Please, take the bet that I am one of the hopeless PUM(Fat)A whiners – and I must commend your clever injection of the word "Fat" in the acronym, however, am surprised you didn’t choose something a little more daring like P(C)U(NT)MA.
You know nothing about me, or what I believe, or who I support, or whether or not I am capable of joking, or whether I am married or gay or even like beer – but I do know that your screen name makes me believe you are anything but a "Chris111,” but most definitely a “Dick000.”
#105
Aug. 21, 2008 - 1:04 PM EST
I wrote John F. Harris Editor-in-Chief, Ryan P. Mannion, Managing Editor, Website Technology and more than 50 emails to Website Feedback asking that a feature be added to enable members to ‘block’ PMs from specified other members – and received NO response.
A perverted member of Politico has been sending this user ID – literally – HUNDREDS of PMs – the ones I opened accidentally were quite insane – rantings about the WTC, terrorism, his inability to hold a job, how the FBI is 'after him' – some, 20 pages in length – pockmarked w/ vulgarities, obscenities and photos of certain parts of his anatomy and more recently, threats of violence and vows of revenge. Following me from thread to thread, he would post personal messages of a disturbing sexual nature – and when I did not respond, his posting became even more vile and obscene.
Politico, impotent in their willingness or ability to do anything, did nothing and advised me to set my profile to 'private.'
Anyhoo, that did nothing - you can still receive PMs even if your profile is on 'private,' so I decided the best thing is to no longer use this ID.
He’s all yours, Politico!
REPLY:
8/21/2008 3:29:52 PM
Dear xxx;
Just so you know, we used to have a great time cracking on people and I know you would laugh so hard trading emails with me also. Someone must have hacked into my account because I did not send any of those things and I never did anything such. Instead, someone kept "deactivating" my account and blaming me for something that the politico.com staff was doing. Using my account to send you mean emails while we were getting 2000 hits on each of your postings. You can clearly see I have stopped emailing you and I DO HAVE YOUR NEW EMAIL. I only send mail there WHEN YOU SEND ME MAIL WITH YOUR REPLY TO PROVE IT WAS ME.
None of my postings have ever discussed ANY of those topics and it HAS TO BE SOMEONE ON POLITICO trying to get you to send naked pictures. I have never sent any naked pictures, never. Who is trying to ask you about sex, it is not me? I DO NOT ASK OR HAVE EVER ASKED YOU ABOUT YOUR PRIVATE LIFE! NEVER. I have never asked or sent any pictures, asked for any, suggest any intercourse and way to... If I want to I will just call you or come over. So it seems as though one of or the politico.com staffs wishes to get some action but I and using me to accomplish that.
Thanks politico.com for clearing that up and making SSC hate me now... i am not doing it or did and THEY KNEW THIS, SSC ALSO KNEW THIS AND I HAVE HER NEW EMAIL. Their staff was flat out jealous and since I have avoided and avoided talking to you, anybody, or even posting. I did not and never did any of this and I swear someone was breaking into my account even if I marked it “private.” I had 100 views when I made it private and it was WORSE!
I stopped talking you altogether and actually got a new friend on another site and hardly come here anymore because of what happened to you and me. I DO NOT KNOW IF THIS IS ABOUT YOU OR ME BUT WE USED TO GET OVER 2000 HITS ON OUR QUESTION AND ANSWER SESSIONS AND 100’S OF DELETED POSTINGS. I NEVER DID ANY OF THIS; IT IS AND WAS A CONSPIRACY ON POLITICO’S STAFF AND USING MY NAME.
But they had evidence or said they did!
I would set my account to private because of so many problems and SSC getting so mad. Then I would get 30 “views” a day which caused me to wonder who or why anyone was “viewing” my account, yet nothing suggested anybody was emailing or doing what she described. All I know was none of my posts related to it and I did not and never asked her for any details of her love life.
She sent me bizarre emails which I kept on asking about but never got the chance about emailing luckyirishgoddess or a few of those names and I was wondering why I would email them; I never spoke to them or wanted to. Was she saying they wanted to talk to me or was she saying they were emailing her about me? I dunno… my head only EXPLODED… but SSC and I used to get over 2000 hits on our posts and so many replies I spent hours a day on here. Then I left and stopped and like some inner city, they began to brag about how tough and how responsive they were!
Sorry, me no ghetto, me no love you long time either!
8/21/2008 4:08:48 PM
COMMENTS AND WHY THEY DELETE POSTINGS (UNAPPROVED)
As you can see and as I have stated before, the ideal VP of Obama would be a lawyer and with a less background influence than Hillary. Such the case with Edwards and he is proving why he himself needs a good lawyer because soon he will need to explain about using campaign finance money to refurbish his out of wedlock affair and neo-natal neo conservatism.
Many conservatives like to suggest that voting on a party line is necessary good for the party but it can have a negative impact in the long term and cause a string of upsets in the legislative branch or even the judicial branch. I do not think voting on a party line is good and should be closely examined as “what is good for the nation.” It’s good to weather a storm than sink the ship. In this case, Obama is painful and so is McCain; but we can stop McCain, we cannot stop Obama. That stands as uncontested even if those who vote party line are too stupid or ignorant to notice what they are doing to their friends and associates while they pledge their loyalty. These two candidates are very similar and they are both honest and sincere as you can tell. Neither will lie to the public if they are elected (ahem ahem, sniff).
I am not the only here who disagrees with this analysis and even SSC can see the wisdom in this very difficult question and answer session. Neither candidate is ideal for the nation but one can be stopped while the other is terrifying to say the least. This is no gateway to heaven you know; let’s not act like it is and be more honest than the competitors.
1. What is rich? Rishe is admitting you are (like owning an expensive car, you are rishe)
2. Can we define marriage? Yes it is a traditional union between an man and a woman meant to join them for the purpose of one existence and procreating. Is same sex marriage this one existence? It is only for financial reasons and cannot be lumped sum as “traditional” understandings of what marriage is about. However, there can be provisions which can allow for same sex unions to be one existence for only financial reasons. What other reasons are there? Adopt a child? The death tax? Taxes? Why do you have to ruin marriage if this is only for financial reasons?
3. Obama was wrong on marriage. Legal marriages can fail while true unions can never wither. The financial part is different and mostly paperwork. Same sex unions are on that line but like animals and fishes in nature, they are born with mothering and fathering skills. How many gay animals do you know who have mothering instincts or go through the motions with an insect or mammal with the same sex?
Although poverty and human conditions in Kenya or for that matter all of Africa are at times near famine or babies dying like wildebeests in barren plains without something as simple as clean water, you have to ask if there are any efforts to improve the conditions there. It seems like every time I turn on my TV, I hear about genocide and when a story from Afranca comes in, it is about human tragedy or suffering.
Maybe Obama does have a sense of purpose in life where humanitarian aid, medicine, and a desire to lessen the suffering in this world so that the number of babies born with AIDS or who die not having enough to eat at night can be addressed. If Obama was insolvent to the idea that suffering exists in this world, then he knows in the bottom of his heart, how it feels to grow up poor, oppressed, and even going to bed at night hungry or malnourished.
That is not the problem here. The problem here is this is his blood brother and you cannot overlook the blood bond and his desire to help or help fix the conditions which plague not only Kenya (a very rich safari and wilderness)but just about the entirety of Africa. . There is no amount of money in this world and no amount of aid on this planet which is enough to fix this problem or his long lost brother and that is the saddest part.
Until or unless Obama can get in there and truly tell his brother or his people why they need to consider their own future and to produce the conditions which allow the sick and the unwanted from proper development or even prosperity, there is no leader in this world, no rich fortune or amount of money, and no amount of suffering which will ever be able to understand why little babies starve in their own mothers arms and what it feels like to go to bed hungry or starving to death.
It is a sad story and Obama does or may have a good intention; but ask what good is that and how much worse he can make it. Can he make it or do they need to make their own future; that is the mystery of life and the proof of pudding which human existence has professed to for centuries on end.
How many people in this world can watch as a child starves to death or goes to bed hungry? Now how many people can watch this story about his brother and the personal triumph or tale that if Obama could or had the power to do so, he would and he would give them a better life and one which they might deserve?
You cannot declare someone at war yet until they are your enemy and so far, we are not at war. Just imagine your long lost brother doing his thing and inspired or a child going to bed hungry and not knowing why or left with this memory 20 years later. Why is that sad?
8/22/2008 8:55:46 AM
This site (politico.com) is like a dungeon. I do not know if you have ever lived with a total loser or someone who gives you all the attention when you want none from them and wish them dead. I will speak for XXX because I know she is not a loser amd does not like a life with losers. This site is old, decrepit, and reeks of dead flesh and a lonely measly life to be so intrusive in the life of people who are not.
Unless or until you have lived a life that has a total loser so intrusive and so annoyingly giving you attention, you really do not and cannot say. Mostly, they are losers in general and some are just old and stupid. I am sure they lived a long life and now their geriatric motives are almost identical to some loser you make fun of and want to inflict pain on.
When you are a winner, you surround yourself with winners. When you are a loser, then you have a big following. I know and we all know who is the winner and who is the loser because the loser is the quiet and the one who hates others talking about what their problem is.
This site is not a winner. However, the people who actually are here like SS&C and I are winners but they feel that being a loser is a way of life and we all know what this feels like NOW! Life with a loser is miserable…
The scary part is it is a way of life to these people and no money in the world will ever compensate for their stupid SOB story. They do not deserve to live. Have you ever worked with a total loser and does it not make you want to kill them for BEING A TOTAL LOSER who feels superior or powerful?
8/21/2008 4:13:10 PM
THE POSTING WHICH GOT ME BANNED AND RESTRICTD FROM MORE POSING IF YOU MISSED IT: ON THE 12TH AMENDMENT…
Slavery by and large has been the worst thing ever to happen to America. It produced extreme hate, a gatewar to communism, rampant crime, buck tooth elitism, ghettos, catholic nonsense, bad music, bad porn, and most of all bad people.
I would make fun of McCain all day if I knew it would make the race problem go away and make them realize they are the problem also. Slavery brought us hate, centuries of crimes, some gateway to communism, really BAD porn, bad music, and of course the LAST RACIST PRESIDENT, OBAMA.
This is why I HAD A PROBLEM with conservatives… (Rove, Limbaugh, and a few others) who told me to back off or get lost. Now I defected and am an official communist revolutionary now! Long live Che, Chavez, Mao, Hoe, Deng, Lenin, Ski, Stolen, and Mugabe (and Obama).
McCain is willing to cut taxes more competitively than Obama but he is not willing to denounce Obama on his tax policies or his prerequisite that government define how many houses Obama can own over the course of his entire life. That is your problem with McCain; he is willing to cut taxes 10% when Obama needs 10% more.
Until or unless Obama can get in there and truly tell his brother or his people why they need to consider their own future and to produce the conditions which allow the sick and the unwanted from proper development or even prosperity, there is no leader in this world, no rich fortune or amount of money, and no amount of suffering which will ever be able to understand why little babies starve in their own mothers arms and what it feels like to go to bed hungry or starving to death.
8/21/2008 3:29:52 PM
Dear SSC;
Just so you know, we used to have a great time cracking on people and I know you would laugh so hard trading emails with me also. Someone must have hacked into my account because I did not send any of those things and I never did anything such. Instead, someone kept "deactivating" my account and blaming me for something that the politico.com staff was doing. Using my account to send you mean emails while we were getting 2000 hits on each of your postings. You can clearly see I have stopped emailing you and I DO HAVE YOUR NEW EMAIL. I only send mail there WHEN YOU SEND ME MAIL WITH YOUR REPLY TO PROVE IT WAS ME.
None of my postings have ever discussed ANY of those topics and it HAS TO BE SOMEONE ON POLITICO trying to get you to send naked pictures. I have never sent any naked pictures, never. Who is trying to ask you about sex, it is not me? I DO NOT ASK OR HAVE EVER ASKED YOU ABOUT YOUR PRIVATE LIFE! NEVER. I have never asked or sent any pictures, asked for any, suggest any intercourse and way to... If I want to I will just call you or come over. So it seems as though one of or the politico.com staffs wishes to get some action but I and using me to accomplish that.
Thanks politico.com for clearing that up and making SSC hate me now... i am not doing it or did and THEY KNEW THIS, SSC ALSO KNEW THIS AND I HAVE HER NEW EMAIL. Their staff was flat out jealous and since I have avoided and avoided talking to you, anybody, or even posting. I did not and never did any of this and I swear someone was breaking into my account even if I marked it “private.” I had 100 views when I made it private and it was WORSE!
I stopped talking you altogether and actually got a new friend on another site and hardly come here anymore because of what happened to you and me. I DO NOT KNOW IF THIS IS ABOUT YOU OR ME BUT WE USED TO GET OVER 2000 HITS ON OUR QUESTION AND ANSWER SESSIONS AND 100’S OF DELETED POSTINGS. I NEVER DID ANY OF THIS; IT IS AND WAS A CONSPIRACY ON POLITICO’S STAFF AND USING MY NAME.
But they had evidence or said they did!
Not_Meant_2B
8/21/2008 99:49:99 PM
I would set my account to private because of so many problems and SSC getting so mad. Then I would get 30 “views” a day which caused me to wonder who or why anyone was “viewing” my account, yet nothing suggested anybody was emailing or doing what she described. All I know was none of my posts related to it and I did not and never asked her for any details of her love life.
She sent me bizarre emails which I kept on asking about but never got the chance about emailing luckyirishgoddess or a few of those names and I was wondering why I would email them; I never spoke to them or wanted to. Was she saying they wanted to talk to me or was she saying they were emailing her about me? I dunno… my head only EXPLODED… but SSC and I used to get over 2000 hits on our posts and so many replies I spent hours a day on here. Then I left and stopped and like some inner city, they began to brag about how tough and how responsive they were!
Sorry, me no ghetto, me no love you long time either!
So Ann, did they love you or was it just… (Ah, so they know now that you were not flirting and were taken all this time! That makes me so jealous!) In no way am I disappointed and in no way will I loose faith or confidence unless you give me a reason to. Raging political wildfires on Kausfiles.com and Politico.com (go to politico.com and win back that hill from the sappers!) I think they are only stalkers and wanted to outsmart you but could not and have not given up or thrown in the towel.
Call in the troops! Hold on and hold on tight my love… and understand you are in the mist of psychopaths who are tracing your cell phone (tower ID lock or smart chip – will write up the CDMA or GSM tower couplers to capacity), credit card, email, and IP address. What was that old phrase in politics, “don’t whisper too loudly or else we might hear you.” Trust me, they were doing all of this to me also okay and had so many investigations to encourage “a rescue” or a “love connection” scandal. The DA and the police were on me about your love connection and they knew a long time ago. Life behind enemy lines and mistreated like a POW. Coming to rescue you okay my lovely… and there is no disappointment, you are a perfect 10 and above, no joke and hands down!
Cyber_Warfare_HQ
DID THIS BACKFIRE ON THE OBAMA CAMP (TEARING HIM UP) AND HOW QUICK WAS IT EXTINGUISHED? DEBATE WAS ON POLITICO.COM (TORN UP)
Tuesday, August 26, 2008
BREITBART: 'The Inconvenient Obama'
Andrew Breitbart
ANALYSIS/OPINION:
Sen. Barack Obama has a problem. And it lives in a hut.
His name is George Hussein Onyango Obama, and he is the 26-year-old half brother of Mr. Obama, the multimillionaire autobiographer who neglected to write that his paternal sibling lives on less than a dollar a month in the outer slums of Nairobi, Kenya.
They have met twice.
Unearthed by Italian Vanity Fair and virtually ignored by the American press, the inconvenient George Obama could emerge as a compelling character in the freshman senator's carefully edited road-to-the-White-House narrative - especially now that his campaign has unleashed a personal attack on Sen. John McCain's station in life.
The Obama hit job on Mr. McCain seizes on his clumsiness in answering a reporter's question about how many houses he and his wife, Cindy, own. "I think - I'll have my staff get to you," Mr. McCain fumbled. In a well-funded nationally televised ad spot titled "Seven," Mr. Obama's messenger twice repeats the correct answer as the words on the screen reinforce the meme of class warfare.
"Seven. Worth $13 million."
The Sunday morning shows parroted Mr. Obama's shocking discovery that the McCain family is well-off. Smarting Obamaniacs campaigning for their messiah are now scripted to ask voters in battleground states how many houses they own and participate in an official campaign contest, "Who Wants to Be a Millionaire: McCain Edition." Winners receive hope, change and fist bumps - spoils of the "new kind of politics."
Someone who made $4.2 million last year and lives in a mansion that a mobster helped pay for should not be throwing stones. When Mr. Obama's flesh-and-blood lives in squalor, raising the standard of living of his opponent's extended family is probably not a smart idea.
(Google for full article above or visit Ann Coulter web site…)
Rush; are you a gateway to liberalism, corruption, communism, secret white supremacy, and a world of hate filled problems of this world? A yes or no will be fine! No need to defend the Pope behind enemy lines. This monolith used the race card to humiliate me and the race card to produce a high priestess and they did not even know they were dealing with psychos and commandoes and how they were trespassing on our mission. So now, you do not want to get out of our mission and want to stay behind enemy lines? What now? Either you play a mission card or try to grab ours; can you take ours or did you already fail so many times already?
Why do you feel Ann does the dirty work for me or why do you refuse to believe I do the dirty work for her? Why? How did you come up with that doozy after so many people are trying to figure out what is going on? This is not about us, it is about them, and do you get it? Who is them and who does their dirty work?
#81
Aug. 19, 2008 - 4:37 PM EST updated
My, my, my, what a grumpy little man you are! Please, take the bet that I am one of the hopeless PUM(Fat)A whiners – and I must commend your clever injection of the word "Fat" in the acronym, however, am surprised you didn’t choose something a little more daring like P(C)U(NT)MA.
You know nothing about me, or what I believe, or who I support, or whether or not I am capable of joking, or whether I am married or gay or even like beer – but I do know that your screen name makes me believe you are anything but a "Chris111,” but most definitely a “Dick000.”
#105
Aug. 21, 2008 - 1:04 PM EST
I wrote John F. Harris Editor-in-Chief, Ryan P. Mannion, Managing Editor, Website Technology and more than 50 emails to Website Feedback asking that a feature be added to enable members to ‘block’ PMs from specified other members – and received NO response.
A perverted member of Politico has been sending this user ID – literally – HUNDREDS of PMs – the ones I opened accidentally were quite insane – rantings about the WTC, terrorism, his inability to hold a job, how the FBI is 'after him' – some, 20 pages in length – pockmarked w/ vulgarities, obscenities and photos of certain parts of his anatomy and more recently, threats of violence and vows of revenge. Following me from thread to thread, he would post personal messages of a disturbing sexual nature – and when I did not respond, his posting became even more vile and obscene.
Politico, impotent in their willingness or ability to do anything, did nothing and advised me to set my profile to 'private.'
Anyhoo, that did nothing - you can still receive PMs even if your profile is on 'private,' so I decided the best thing is to no longer use this ID.
He’s all yours, Politico!
REPLY:
8/21/2008 3:29:52 PM
Dear xxx;
Just so you know, we used to have a great time cracking on people and I know you would laugh so hard trading emails with me also. Someone must have hacked into my account because I did not send any of those things and I never did anything such. Instead, someone kept "deactivating" my account and blaming me for something that the politico.com staff was doing. Using my account to send you mean emails while we were getting 2000 hits on each of your postings. You can clearly see I have stopped emailing you and I DO HAVE YOUR NEW EMAIL. I only send mail there WHEN YOU SEND ME MAIL WITH YOUR REPLY TO PROVE IT WAS ME.
None of my postings have ever discussed ANY of those topics and it HAS TO BE SOMEONE ON POLITICO trying to get you to send naked pictures. I have never sent any naked pictures, never. Who is trying to ask you about sex, it is not me? I DO NOT ASK OR HAVE EVER ASKED YOU ABOUT YOUR PRIVATE LIFE! NEVER. I have never asked or sent any pictures, asked for any, suggest any intercourse and way to... If I want to I will just call you or come over. So it seems as though one of or the politico.com staffs wishes to get some action but I and using me to accomplish that.
Thanks politico.com for clearing that up and making SSC hate me now... i am not doing it or did and THEY KNEW THIS, SSC ALSO KNEW THIS AND I HAVE HER NEW EMAIL. Their staff was flat out jealous and since I have avoided and avoided talking to you, anybody, or even posting. I did not and never did any of this and I swear someone was breaking into my account even if I marked it “private.” I had 100 views when I made it private and it was WORSE!
I stopped talking you altogether and actually got a new friend on another site and hardly come here anymore because of what happened to you and me. I DO NOT KNOW IF THIS IS ABOUT YOU OR ME BUT WE USED TO GET OVER 2000 HITS ON OUR QUESTION AND ANSWER SESSIONS AND 100’S OF DELETED POSTINGS. I NEVER DID ANY OF THIS; IT IS AND WAS A CONSPIRACY ON POLITICO’S STAFF AND USING MY NAME.
But they had evidence or said they did!
I would set my account to private because of so many problems and SSC getting so mad. Then I would get 30 “views” a day which caused me to wonder who or why anyone was “viewing” my account, yet nothing suggested anybody was emailing or doing what she described. All I know was none of my posts related to it and I did not and never asked her for any details of her love life.
She sent me bizarre emails which I kept on asking about but never got the chance about emailing luckyirishgoddess or a few of those names and I was wondering why I would email them; I never spoke to them or wanted to. Was she saying they wanted to talk to me or was she saying they were emailing her about me? I dunno… my head only EXPLODED… but SSC and I used to get over 2000 hits on our posts and so many replies I spent hours a day on here. Then I left and stopped and like some inner city, they began to brag about how tough and how responsive they were!
Sorry, me no ghetto, me no love you long time either!
8/21/2008 4:08:48 PM
COMMENTS AND WHY THEY DELETE POSTINGS (UNAPPROVED)
As you can see and as I have stated before, the ideal VP of Obama would be a lawyer and with a less background influence than Hillary. Such the case with Edwards and he is proving why he himself needs a good lawyer because soon he will need to explain about using campaign finance money to refurbish his out of wedlock affair and neo-natal neo conservatism.
Many conservatives like to suggest that voting on a party line is necessary good for the party but it can have a negative impact in the long term and cause a string of upsets in the legislative branch or even the judicial branch. I do not think voting on a party line is good and should be closely examined as “what is good for the nation.” It’s good to weather a storm than sink the ship. In this case, Obama is painful and so is McCain; but we can stop McCain, we cannot stop Obama. That stands as uncontested even if those who vote party line are too stupid or ignorant to notice what they are doing to their friends and associates while they pledge their loyalty. These two candidates are very similar and they are both honest and sincere as you can tell. Neither will lie to the public if they are elected (ahem ahem, sniff).
I am not the only here who disagrees with this analysis and even SSC can see the wisdom in this very difficult question and answer session. Neither candidate is ideal for the nation but one can be stopped while the other is terrifying to say the least. This is no gateway to heaven you know; let’s not act like it is and be more honest than the competitors.
1. What is rich? Rishe is admitting you are (like owning an expensive car, you are rishe)
2. Can we define marriage? Yes it is a traditional union between an man and a woman meant to join them for the purpose of one existence and procreating. Is same sex marriage this one existence? It is only for financial reasons and cannot be lumped sum as “traditional” understandings of what marriage is about. However, there can be provisions which can allow for same sex unions to be one existence for only financial reasons. What other reasons are there? Adopt a child? The death tax? Taxes? Why do you have to ruin marriage if this is only for financial reasons?
3. Obama was wrong on marriage. Legal marriages can fail while true unions can never wither. The financial part is different and mostly paperwork. Same sex unions are on that line but like animals and fishes in nature, they are born with mothering and fathering skills. How many gay animals do you know who have mothering instincts or go through the motions with an insect or mammal with the same sex?
Although poverty and human conditions in Kenya or for that matter all of Africa are at times near famine or babies dying like wildebeests in barren plains without something as simple as clean water, you have to ask if there are any efforts to improve the conditions there. It seems like every time I turn on my TV, I hear about genocide and when a story from Afranca comes in, it is about human tragedy or suffering.
Maybe Obama does have a sense of purpose in life where humanitarian aid, medicine, and a desire to lessen the suffering in this world so that the number of babies born with AIDS or who die not having enough to eat at night can be addressed. If Obama was insolvent to the idea that suffering exists in this world, then he knows in the bottom of his heart, how it feels to grow up poor, oppressed, and even going to bed at night hungry or malnourished.
That is not the problem here. The problem here is this is his blood brother and you cannot overlook the blood bond and his desire to help or help fix the conditions which plague not only Kenya (a very rich safari and wilderness)but just about the entirety of Africa. . There is no amount of money in this world and no amount of aid on this planet which is enough to fix this problem or his long lost brother and that is the saddest part.
Until or unless Obama can get in there and truly tell his brother or his people why they need to consider their own future and to produce the conditions which allow the sick and the unwanted from proper development or even prosperity, there is no leader in this world, no rich fortune or amount of money, and no amount of suffering which will ever be able to understand why little babies starve in their own mothers arms and what it feels like to go to bed hungry or starving to death.
It is a sad story and Obama does or may have a good intention; but ask what good is that and how much worse he can make it. Can he make it or do they need to make their own future; that is the mystery of life and the proof of pudding which human existence has professed to for centuries on end.
How many people in this world can watch as a child starves to death or goes to bed hungry? Now how many people can watch this story about his brother and the personal triumph or tale that if Obama could or had the power to do so, he would and he would give them a better life and one which they might deserve?
You cannot declare someone at war yet until they are your enemy and so far, we are not at war. Just imagine your long lost brother doing his thing and inspired or a child going to bed hungry and not knowing why or left with this memory 20 years later. Why is that sad?
8/22/2008 8:55:46 AM
This site (politico.com) is like a dungeon. I do not know if you have ever lived with a total loser or someone who gives you all the attention when you want none from them and wish them dead. I will speak for XXX because I know she is not a loser amd does not like a life with losers. This site is old, decrepit, and reeks of dead flesh and a lonely measly life to be so intrusive in the life of people who are not.
Unless or until you have lived a life that has a total loser so intrusive and so annoyingly giving you attention, you really do not and cannot say. Mostly, they are losers in general and some are just old and stupid. I am sure they lived a long life and now their geriatric motives are almost identical to some loser you make fun of and want to inflict pain on.
When you are a winner, you surround yourself with winners. When you are a loser, then you have a big following. I know and we all know who is the winner and who is the loser because the loser is the quiet and the one who hates others talking about what their problem is.
This site is not a winner. However, the people who actually are here like SS&C and I are winners but they feel that being a loser is a way of life and we all know what this feels like NOW! Life with a loser is miserable…
The scary part is it is a way of life to these people and no money in the world will ever compensate for their stupid SOB story. They do not deserve to live. Have you ever worked with a total loser and does it not make you want to kill them for BEING A TOTAL LOSER who feels superior or powerful?
8/21/2008 4:13:10 PM
THE POSTING WHICH GOT ME BANNED AND RESTRICTD FROM MORE POSING IF YOU MISSED IT: ON THE 12TH AMENDMENT…
Slavery by and large has been the worst thing ever to happen to America. It produced extreme hate, a gatewar to communism, rampant crime, buck tooth elitism, ghettos, catholic nonsense, bad music, bad porn, and most of all bad people.
I would make fun of McCain all day if I knew it would make the race problem go away and make them realize they are the problem also. Slavery brought us hate, centuries of crimes, some gateway to communism, really BAD porn, bad music, and of course the LAST RACIST PRESIDENT, OBAMA.
This is why I HAD A PROBLEM with conservatives… (Rove, Limbaugh, and a few others) who told me to back off or get lost. Now I defected and am an official communist revolutionary now! Long live Che, Chavez, Mao, Hoe, Deng, Lenin, Ski, Stolen, and Mugabe (and Obama).
McCain is willing to cut taxes more competitively than Obama but he is not willing to denounce Obama on his tax policies or his prerequisite that government define how many houses Obama can own over the course of his entire life. That is your problem with McCain; he is willing to cut taxes 10% when Obama needs 10% more.
Until or unless Obama can get in there and truly tell his brother or his people why they need to consider their own future and to produce the conditions which allow the sick and the unwanted from proper development or even prosperity, there is no leader in this world, no rich fortune or amount of money, and no amount of suffering which will ever be able to understand why little babies starve in their own mothers arms and what it feels like to go to bed hungry or starving to death.
8/21/2008 3:29:52 PM
Dear SSC;
Just so you know, we used to have a great time cracking on people and I know you would laugh so hard trading emails with me also. Someone must have hacked into my account because I did not send any of those things and I never did anything such. Instead, someone kept "deactivating" my account and blaming me for something that the politico.com staff was doing. Using my account to send you mean emails while we were getting 2000 hits on each of your postings. You can clearly see I have stopped emailing you and I DO HAVE YOUR NEW EMAIL. I only send mail there WHEN YOU SEND ME MAIL WITH YOUR REPLY TO PROVE IT WAS ME.
None of my postings have ever discussed ANY of those topics and it HAS TO BE SOMEONE ON POLITICO trying to get you to send naked pictures. I have never sent any naked pictures, never. Who is trying to ask you about sex, it is not me? I DO NOT ASK OR HAVE EVER ASKED YOU ABOUT YOUR PRIVATE LIFE! NEVER. I have never asked or sent any pictures, asked for any, suggest any intercourse and way to... If I want to I will just call you or come over. So it seems as though one of or the politico.com staffs wishes to get some action but I and using me to accomplish that.
Thanks politico.com for clearing that up and making SSC hate me now... i am not doing it or did and THEY KNEW THIS, SSC ALSO KNEW THIS AND I HAVE HER NEW EMAIL. Their staff was flat out jealous and since I have avoided and avoided talking to you, anybody, or even posting. I did not and never did any of this and I swear someone was breaking into my account even if I marked it “private.” I had 100 views when I made it private and it was WORSE!
I stopped talking you altogether and actually got a new friend on another site and hardly come here anymore because of what happened to you and me. I DO NOT KNOW IF THIS IS ABOUT YOU OR ME BUT WE USED TO GET OVER 2000 HITS ON OUR QUESTION AND ANSWER SESSIONS AND 100’S OF DELETED POSTINGS. I NEVER DID ANY OF THIS; IT IS AND WAS A CONSPIRACY ON POLITICO’S STAFF AND USING MY NAME.
But they had evidence or said they did!
Not_Meant_2B
8/21/2008 99:49:99 PM
I would set my account to private because of so many problems and SSC getting so mad. Then I would get 30 “views” a day which caused me to wonder who or why anyone was “viewing” my account, yet nothing suggested anybody was emailing or doing what she described. All I know was none of my posts related to it and I did not and never asked her for any details of her love life.
She sent me bizarre emails which I kept on asking about but never got the chance about emailing luckyirishgoddess or a few of those names and I was wondering why I would email them; I never spoke to them or wanted to. Was she saying they wanted to talk to me or was she saying they were emailing her about me? I dunno… my head only EXPLODED… but SSC and I used to get over 2000 hits on our posts and so many replies I spent hours a day on here. Then I left and stopped and like some inner city, they began to brag about how tough and how responsive they were!
Sorry, me no ghetto, me no love you long time either!
So Ann, did they love you or was it just… (Ah, so they know now that you were not flirting and were taken all this time! That makes me so jealous!) In no way am I disappointed and in no way will I loose faith or confidence unless you give me a reason to. Raging political wildfires on Kausfiles.com and Politico.com (go to politico.com and win back that hill from the sappers!) I think they are only stalkers and wanted to outsmart you but could not and have not given up or thrown in the towel.
Call in the troops! Hold on and hold on tight my love… and understand you are in the mist of psychopaths who are tracing your cell phone (tower ID lock or smart chip – will write up the CDMA or GSM tower couplers to capacity), credit card, email, and IP address. What was that old phrase in politics, “don’t whisper too loudly or else we might hear you.” Trust me, they were doing all of this to me also okay and had so many investigations to encourage “a rescue” or a “love connection” scandal. The DA and the police were on me about your love connection and they knew a long time ago. Life behind enemy lines and mistreated like a POW. Coming to rescue you okay my lovely… and there is no disappointment, you are a perfect 10 and above, no joke and hands down!
Cyber_Warfare_HQ
DID THIS BACKFIRE ON THE OBAMA CAMP (TEARING HIM UP) AND HOW QUICK WAS IT EXTINGUISHED? DEBATE WAS ON POLITICO.COM (TORN UP)
Tuesday, August 26, 2008
BREITBART: 'The Inconvenient Obama'
Andrew Breitbart
ANALYSIS/OPINION:
Sen. Barack Obama has a problem. And it lives in a hut.
His name is George Hussein Onyango Obama, and he is the 26-year-old half brother of Mr. Obama, the multimillionaire autobiographer who neglected to write that his paternal sibling lives on less than a dollar a month in the outer slums of Nairobi, Kenya.
They have met twice.
Unearthed by Italian Vanity Fair and virtually ignored by the American press, the inconvenient George Obama could emerge as a compelling character in the freshman senator's carefully edited road-to-the-White-House narrative - especially now that his campaign has unleashed a personal attack on Sen. John McCain's station in life.
The Obama hit job on Mr. McCain seizes on his clumsiness in answering a reporter's question about how many houses he and his wife, Cindy, own. "I think - I'll have my staff get to you," Mr. McCain fumbled. In a well-funded nationally televised ad spot titled "Seven," Mr. Obama's messenger twice repeats the correct answer as the words on the screen reinforce the meme of class warfare.
"Seven. Worth $13 million."
The Sunday morning shows parroted Mr. Obama's shocking discovery that the McCain family is well-off. Smarting Obamaniacs campaigning for their messiah are now scripted to ask voters in battleground states how many houses they own and participate in an official campaign contest, "Who Wants to Be a Millionaire: McCain Edition." Winners receive hope, change and fist bumps - spoils of the "new kind of politics."
Someone who made $4.2 million last year and lives in a mansion that a mobster helped pay for should not be throwing stones. When Mr. Obama's flesh-and-blood lives in squalor, raising the standard of living of his opponent's extended family is probably not a smart idea.
(Google for full article above or visit Ann Coulter web site…)
Sunday, August 24, 2008
OBAMA FIRST MAJOR VICTORY IS BIDEN
8/24/2008 9:40:58 PM
The question is why was Hillary teaming up with B. Hussein to win this coming election and what sneaky mischievous endeavor did they have in the witches brew. What is going on in America which caused a surge in not only infidelity but also bad judgment and nearing rebel yell angry political persuasions?
If anybody has not noticed, the high tech boom produced a record amount of millionaires while the clicks and bricks virtual world threw on the B2B victim list a consolidation of enterprises. The iconology went global and high tech enabled vast reaches and markets. Furthermore, the traditional of business had to be scrapped for the incredible investments and new millionaire high tech booms. The economy turned against the left wing and this focus on labor.
Metropolitan areas are no longer needed. The online world put an end to this. With the jobs moving to more competitive areas, shifting overseas, vast labor disputes unsinkable, and the city landscape dilapidated; the economy of scale focused on fiscal debt and implosion. The urban landscape is imploding.
What is happening with this implosion? Jobs are lost and people move. People move to find employment and property and business areas loose their merit. With a scattered population social services and organizations must consolidate if they are competitive. Social problems exceed the capacity and cost to keep them running. Now the urban leaders rise taxes to compensate and it causes more problems and a backwash.
Schools are shut down. Police departments are inefficient and scattered. Public transportation is not used. People become older and sicker but the base of paying or growing economies cannot support the system and health care, the most expensive of all the cost begins to be an issue.
Mostly, it is the closing of hospitals. The increase in cost of medical care and the increasing in paying patients or the overall lack of satisfaction in the job for medical professionals; hence, the scramble to find a more secure neighborhood to provide medical care for.
Essentially, the Democrats wanted health care and universal health care to offset this implosion before the hospitals close down or becomes a preventive failure. People do not eat healthy, they do not exercise, and they do not make efforts to cure that traditional ways of ridding this lack of health care worry.
In this urban landscape, hospitals are the first to suffer because they operate at such high costs. Without subsidies or some way to compete in an uncompetitive environment, they go out of business and this introduces the idea of subsidized or socialized health care.
Hillary Clinton was running on this idea and it was struck down by the idea that either health care was going to be destroyed or social security. Health care as the GAO has coincidently identified runs parallel to retirement benefits. People live longer but they are also less healthy now. Good or excellent health care does not change their overall health; it prolongs their life instead.
The Clintons were struck down by this dilemma and the increasing idea they would sacrifice social security and a rush to judgment. They had two plans which had already failed but were counting on a third one to win the election and to set into law socialized medicine.
That is part of the dilemma within the medical field to never turn a patient away but it is becoming an ever increasing way to cut cost and produce a profit. The reason being that as the urban landscape is thinning out, hospitals do not have the same capacity levels and must close or shrink its staff.
The Democrat and Clinton surge for socialized medicine was struck down and deemed a failure which they knew their election victory was going to be a farce and unbeatable. You have to fix social security before you begin to address the medical problem or you have to figure out why people are less healthy but living longer and more lazy.
It will end up the same answers. Socialism does not work and even if you have standards and a civilized human being, you must work harder and harder just to keep the machinery working efficiently. The idea is socialism is a resting point to make life more or less culpable to the economic climate and forces and this is where the fundamental problems lie.
You simply cannot continue on a course of socialism while using debt to finance an already tremendous crisis and you will never fix something which is permanently broken or so inefficient it will never work right. That is the problem with socialism and communism to begin with and as we know already; to fix the human condition does not take one cent. What it does take is the market to correct and we are witnessing this correction and there is not a damn thing we, they or anybody can do about it. It is just a disaster from the minds of a jackass.
On that note, if you look at the bankrolling of the political candidates, they seem to hedge all of their bets. George Sorros supports both McCain and Obama while neglecting Hillary which tells the political chicken bones the oracle is heavily weighted for Hillary. Now Soros is confused and it will be a toss up to figure out who will produce for him. Stock pickers never address a good buy and what they truly want. Therefore, when you play with these big money people, they do not think like military strategist or a tactical commando who knows how the battlefield works and can change it in an instant. They are all just playing Gods with real life Gods and it will be a mistake they will never recover from.
Biden, the conservative expert rambler, has been filling the airwaves for the past 12 months while Hillary has opted to run a platform which was so shot up it was bound to fail. The only way was to ride the coat tails of Obama who saw her as waiting to use the race card for her own political agenda which had no measure of success. Either Obama was going to look stupid for being used so badly or he was going to choose Biden who survived years of rational oratory rambling but never getting anywhere.
He is viewed as moralistic and wishing to talk things out simply because he never gets anywhere and delivers endless speeches of abstract legal thought but never clear and concise victory. Biden cannot jump the gun or sucker punch if he is always trying to talk for hours on end about nothing. They call it experience and “heavyweight experience” of goliath understanding.
It goes back to this idea of God. God asks clear questions. God does not care and he would rather have people suffer than betray him. He does not shoot inadvertently unless the person can prove it was him. However, when the facts and the truth present a clear understand and need to shoot, it is he against the human who waits for the last minute before leveling his wrath. You can talk all day long about shooting or not but when that wrath unleashes; there will be no talk and no oratory expertise to describe it better than Biden can.
That is the problem with Biden, he wants to talk about God’s wrath and how the human delays or ignores the warnings and he is skilled and seasoned enough to do these days on end and sound intelligent. But when it hits and the storm is on, oratory speech is worthless and only soothes those who wish to listen.
Well, is this just Biden’s problem or the entire dilemma with all the candidates who come from the same church and look all the same and talk all the same while trying to achieve all the same goals with a slight difference, one or two may be a point or two ahead of the other but closing in fast in what appears to be a wheelchair race. Nowadays, it is becoming increasingly difficult to tell who is who and why they all look alike and this applies to McCain, Obama, Biden, Romney, or even the Clintons. They are only a few points ahead of the other and cannot take that leap of faith to the other side we are on.
Whatever change, hope or audacity Obama has in store, Biden will serve it up with endless rambling and oratory which we know has given him over 35 years of stamina and political survival. Quite a clever move if you ask us and so far his best political decision.
The question is why was Hillary teaming up with B. Hussein to win this coming election and what sneaky mischievous endeavor did they have in the witches brew. What is going on in America which caused a surge in not only infidelity but also bad judgment and nearing rebel yell angry political persuasions?
If anybody has not noticed, the high tech boom produced a record amount of millionaires while the clicks and bricks virtual world threw on the B2B victim list a consolidation of enterprises. The iconology went global and high tech enabled vast reaches and markets. Furthermore, the traditional of business had to be scrapped for the incredible investments and new millionaire high tech booms. The economy turned against the left wing and this focus on labor.
Metropolitan areas are no longer needed. The online world put an end to this. With the jobs moving to more competitive areas, shifting overseas, vast labor disputes unsinkable, and the city landscape dilapidated; the economy of scale focused on fiscal debt and implosion. The urban landscape is imploding.
What is happening with this implosion? Jobs are lost and people move. People move to find employment and property and business areas loose their merit. With a scattered population social services and organizations must consolidate if they are competitive. Social problems exceed the capacity and cost to keep them running. Now the urban leaders rise taxes to compensate and it causes more problems and a backwash.
Schools are shut down. Police departments are inefficient and scattered. Public transportation is not used. People become older and sicker but the base of paying or growing economies cannot support the system and health care, the most expensive of all the cost begins to be an issue.
Mostly, it is the closing of hospitals. The increase in cost of medical care and the increasing in paying patients or the overall lack of satisfaction in the job for medical professionals; hence, the scramble to find a more secure neighborhood to provide medical care for.
Essentially, the Democrats wanted health care and universal health care to offset this implosion before the hospitals close down or becomes a preventive failure. People do not eat healthy, they do not exercise, and they do not make efforts to cure that traditional ways of ridding this lack of health care worry.
In this urban landscape, hospitals are the first to suffer because they operate at such high costs. Without subsidies or some way to compete in an uncompetitive environment, they go out of business and this introduces the idea of subsidized or socialized health care.
Hillary Clinton was running on this idea and it was struck down by the idea that either health care was going to be destroyed or social security. Health care as the GAO has coincidently identified runs parallel to retirement benefits. People live longer but they are also less healthy now. Good or excellent health care does not change their overall health; it prolongs their life instead.
The Clintons were struck down by this dilemma and the increasing idea they would sacrifice social security and a rush to judgment. They had two plans which had already failed but were counting on a third one to win the election and to set into law socialized medicine.
That is part of the dilemma within the medical field to never turn a patient away but it is becoming an ever increasing way to cut cost and produce a profit. The reason being that as the urban landscape is thinning out, hospitals do not have the same capacity levels and must close or shrink its staff.
The Democrat and Clinton surge for socialized medicine was struck down and deemed a failure which they knew their election victory was going to be a farce and unbeatable. You have to fix social security before you begin to address the medical problem or you have to figure out why people are less healthy but living longer and more lazy.
It will end up the same answers. Socialism does not work and even if you have standards and a civilized human being, you must work harder and harder just to keep the machinery working efficiently. The idea is socialism is a resting point to make life more or less culpable to the economic climate and forces and this is where the fundamental problems lie.
You simply cannot continue on a course of socialism while using debt to finance an already tremendous crisis and you will never fix something which is permanently broken or so inefficient it will never work right. That is the problem with socialism and communism to begin with and as we know already; to fix the human condition does not take one cent. What it does take is the market to correct and we are witnessing this correction and there is not a damn thing we, they or anybody can do about it. It is just a disaster from the minds of a jackass.
On that note, if you look at the bankrolling of the political candidates, they seem to hedge all of their bets. George Sorros supports both McCain and Obama while neglecting Hillary which tells the political chicken bones the oracle is heavily weighted for Hillary. Now Soros is confused and it will be a toss up to figure out who will produce for him. Stock pickers never address a good buy and what they truly want. Therefore, when you play with these big money people, they do not think like military strategist or a tactical commando who knows how the battlefield works and can change it in an instant. They are all just playing Gods with real life Gods and it will be a mistake they will never recover from.
Biden, the conservative expert rambler, has been filling the airwaves for the past 12 months while Hillary has opted to run a platform which was so shot up it was bound to fail. The only way was to ride the coat tails of Obama who saw her as waiting to use the race card for her own political agenda which had no measure of success. Either Obama was going to look stupid for being used so badly or he was going to choose Biden who survived years of rational oratory rambling but never getting anywhere.
He is viewed as moralistic and wishing to talk things out simply because he never gets anywhere and delivers endless speeches of abstract legal thought but never clear and concise victory. Biden cannot jump the gun or sucker punch if he is always trying to talk for hours on end about nothing. They call it experience and “heavyweight experience” of goliath understanding.
It goes back to this idea of God. God asks clear questions. God does not care and he would rather have people suffer than betray him. He does not shoot inadvertently unless the person can prove it was him. However, when the facts and the truth present a clear understand and need to shoot, it is he against the human who waits for the last minute before leveling his wrath. You can talk all day long about shooting or not but when that wrath unleashes; there will be no talk and no oratory expertise to describe it better than Biden can.
That is the problem with Biden, he wants to talk about God’s wrath and how the human delays or ignores the warnings and he is skilled and seasoned enough to do these days on end and sound intelligent. But when it hits and the storm is on, oratory speech is worthless and only soothes those who wish to listen.
Well, is this just Biden’s problem or the entire dilemma with all the candidates who come from the same church and look all the same and talk all the same while trying to achieve all the same goals with a slight difference, one or two may be a point or two ahead of the other but closing in fast in what appears to be a wheelchair race. Nowadays, it is becoming increasingly difficult to tell who is who and why they all look alike and this applies to McCain, Obama, Biden, Romney, or even the Clintons. They are only a few points ahead of the other and cannot take that leap of faith to the other side we are on.
Whatever change, hope or audacity Obama has in store, Biden will serve it up with endless rambling and oratory which we know has given him over 35 years of stamina and political survival. Quite a clever move if you ask us and so far his best political decision.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
