Friday, January 9, 2009
THIS IS SOME LEGAL RETALIATION AND ONGOING BARRAGE OF ATTACKS
1/9/2009 2:27:04 PM Apparently, someone has been trying to make contact to suggest they have a law suit or is trying to encourage “negotiation” of what is owed to them. The name of the law firm is Mullooly, Jeffrey, et al. (4 Bridge Street, Glen Cove NY 11542) and this has to do with the home invasion and the “gay attempts.” Now they are saying they want it badly? I have written them at least five times, indicated we are working on a terror plot, indicated to them legal protections (civilian or active duty service members are protected from all financial obligations until after their service is complete and sent the code and lawyer handling the case), and the court who tried to prosecute the home invasion refused to read the material and tell the law firm what the issue is. Therefore, we must come to the conclusion the upstairs neighbors, the link to Israel, the link to the Clintons, and the link to the terror plots are interweaved and related. This case involves profiteering, terror plots, a political crime spree, and local level corruption; why am I being harassed and summoned to appear by the people behind it? The culprit is the State of New York and it also suggests an inside job or Albany, NY. This also sounds like federal judges or this link with Rush Limbaugh and the Bush Administration.
SIXTH LETTER TO THE COURTS - ASSISTANCE OR REINFORCEMENTS PLEASE?
1/9/2009 2:36:50 PM
Dear Hon. Mark Anthony Volante; (c/o Wenty K. Hasely, Court Assistance)
This will be the fifth letter to your court and the fifth time I will refer you to the Federal Bureau of Investigation regarding the investigation of a terror plot, local profiteering, a ten year investigation from Washington DC involving the 911 terror plots, corruption, revolving investigation of internal espionage by foreign governments, The State of New York, and various forms of pressure and harassment tactics. I cannot concentrate on this case if you refuse and continue to refuse contact with these parties; the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Buffalo, NY where I have asked for help to substantiate an ongoing investigation. When we close the case and apprehend those behind this; then this case can go forward; but until then we cannot sidetrack and jump on your ending when we have not there yet. What you are doing is trying to stop or end this prosecution and I will refer this case to the FBI with notice to them of a sixth letter to indicate the following.
1. An emergency situation and a national security crisis involving a terror plot
2. The involvement with and of the FBI which I am in communication with
3. Your refusal to suspend the intimidation or attempt to assault and harass myself in the past two years hindering this investigation; I have had to spend over 16 months in your court room for futile and trivial matters while not being able to express a severe problem on your end and my wishes to refer you to a federal prosecutor and the office of the FBI
4. My involvement in this is protected by any and all prosecutions relating to financial burdens; most especially when they are the cause of them or my service is used to prosecute and arrest a terror plot. You cannot keep sending me intimidating letters while we are interrogating and auditing those who are suspects in both a terror plot, 911, and twenty years of investigative work. You must stop or check with the protections of those who are engaged in this effort. You push and harass in a manner to suggest you wish some communication pertaining to this case or wish to block it, sidetrack it, or refuse to abide by the protection clauses I have indicated. This will be the sixth letter and you are not convincing we are close to making an arrest and solving this case.
This will be the sixth letter and while this is a federal case which has utmost jurisdiction; the same material must be sent to you every two months to ask you to contact the FBI or to suspend the pressures so that active or civilian personnel who are working with or for the government can prosecute those behind this terror plot and espionage effort. We are experts on this matter and exceed the talents of the FBI office in Buffalo, NY but you refuse to acknowledge or at least check with either them or a lawyer who is handling this case, Ann Coulter. The federal prosecutor for this case is Ann Coulter and if there is some information you need or wish to subpoena, she will be the contact until the case is closed. It is of utmost National Security and the jurisdiction is beyond what you are trying to instigate here. If you wish to communicate or present evidence to this particular case or terror plot, then please write it out in a clear and concise manner; which will aid in the arrest and prosecution of those behind it.
It does not seem as if you wish to listen to anyone or wish to stop the constant court order to delay, stop, sidetrack, or implicate guilt on those who are working on this. we must refer you to the office of the FBI to ask if you can politely stop until this case is concluded and to not constantly disrupt it with home invasions, court orders, request for money and funds, thousands of dollars in bond or bail, etc… it seems as though there is no stopping this and the pressure to end this investigation of a terror plot. There is a scare tactic every two months for the past two years and along with one home invasion which the FBI Buffalo office is investigating. If this is about corruption, please contact the FBI office; we cannot taint the other cases.
This is the sixth letter to address your “court orders” which is not powerful enough to stop this investigation or the prosecution and conclusion of it. at the same time, this has to be worrying enough to seek priority over a terror plot, further terror plot, and protections indicated in the last five letters to the court. As a former or active military personnel; we are sometimes gagged with the inability to explain in detail but refer you to the protection clauses in the third, fourth, and fifth letter. There is a federal law which clearly must be obeyed and it is there to protect against this sort of harassment and pressure. Please refer to letters three, four, and five and contact the FBI Buffalo office as I will ask them to substantiate an ongoing investigation and my involvement in it. I have contacted them for help and assistance in this matter and also indicated the horrific treatment we have gotten trying to defend the country and the constant harassment by hostile or corrupt forces involved. There are protections and this constant “tic for tat” and “back and forth” must stop while we focus on more important and life or death matters. This is a life or death matter and none of the protections have even been considered by this court. Your actions are bizarre if not irrational.
I will forward this letter to the FBI office Buffalo and ask them to refer you to a point of contact to assist in the matter; it is a matter of life and death. These protections are there for a reason, the Constitution is there also for a reason, please stop using it as a door mat to harass others or prevent a terror plot from escaping; to resolve this and seek prosecution, and we must preserve all evidence. Anything in the past ten years is evidence and forensics to a terror plot. We have submitted all evidence to the FBI and all federal prosecutors on this case including the harassment and home invasion incidences, if they are related or interwoven. We must stop checking in with this court as it is not a life and death situation but we must explain in detail and reveal aspects of this terror plot which can be detrimental to the final result.
Beyond the FBI and the protections indicated; we do not know what else will satisfy you; this is the sixth letter and it is a hostile effort for some reason yet known. We cannot conclude your case until the federal terror case is completed and resolved. We are working with the FBI and others on it. I am military personnel and am protected by the provisions of letter three, four and five. Why is this matter seeking priority over a life and death situation and one of national security? What are you trying to communicate so relevant to this case which we must ignore or stop in our tracks about? The following is clear and concise, yet the court is unable to understand it for some reason. Therefore, you must refer to the FBI office for a full explanation and a further education on how this federal clause is applied to terror plots and those investigating it.
On December 19, 2003, the President of the United States signed into law H.R. 100, the Service members Civil Relief Act. This law completely rewrites the Soldiers and Sailors Civil Relief Act of 1940, expanding many of the previous law's civil protections.
For the purposes of this Act:
(1) SERVICEMEMBER- The term `service member' means a member of the uniformed services, as that term is defined in section 101(a)(5) of title 10, United States Code.
(2) MILITARY SERVICE- The term `military service' means--
(A) in the case of a service member who is a member of the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, or Coast Guard--
(i) Active duty, as defined in section 101(d) (1) of title 10, United States Code, and
(ii) in the case of a member of the National Guard, includes service under a call to active service authorized by the President or the Secretary of Defense for a period of more than 30 consecutive days under section 502(f) of title 32, United States Code, for purposes of responding to a national emergency declared by the President and supported by Federal funds;
(B) in the case of a service member who is a commissioned officer of the Public Health Service or the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, active service; and
(C) Any period during which a service member is absent from duty on account of sickness, wounds, leave, or other lawful cause.
(3) PERIOD OF MILITARY SERVICE- The term `period of military service' means the period beginning on the date on which a service member enters military service and ending on the date on which the service member is released from military service or dies while in military service.
(4) DEPENDENT- The term `dependent', with respect to a service member, means--
(A) The service member’s spouse;
(B) The service member’s child (as defined in section 101(4) of title 38, United States Code); or
(C) An individual for whom the service member provided more than one-half of the individual's support for 180 days immediately preceding an application for relief under this Act.
(5) COURT- The term `court' means a court or an administrative agency of the United States or of any State (including any political subdivision of a State), whether or not a court or administrative agency of record.
(6) STATE- The term `State' includes--
(A) A commonwealth, territory, or possession of the United States; and
(B) The District of Columbia.
(7) SECRETARY CONCERNED- The term `Secretary concerned'--
(A) with respect to a member of the armed forces, has the meaning given that term in section 101(a)(9) of title 10, United States Code;
(B) with respect to a commissioned officer of the Public Health Service, means the Secretary of Health and Human Services; and
(C) With respect to a commissioned officer of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, means the Secretary of Commerce.
(8) MOTOR VEHICLE- The term `motor vehicle' has the meaning given that term in section 30102(a)(6) of title 49, United States Code.
The frustration of the matter has caused this to be referred to the FBI office so that line by line explanation and months of legal jockeying can be educational to the same end or result; we are working on a revolving case, the evidence must be preserved, it has all priority above any other case, and there are protections to ensure this is enforced and faithfully abided. Being the sixth letter, the poor quality of work and the legal ignorance must be referred to the FBI; there comes a point where we have to let people with more authority deal with life and death matters while those who are hostile reverse the effort. Being the sixth letter, it is clear the FBI must be contacted to explain what a terror plot is, what life and death is, what military personnel means, why protections are needed, and what to expect from federal authorities on this case. The frustration of having a home invasion and being arrested, having to dish out thousands in bond, and constant harassment and bickering; all has to be referred to the FBI Buffalo office. I will contact them and tell them to await your arrival or contact to discuss the case or why this is happening. It has to do with corruption and terror plots at both the federal and local level. If your department is involved in this investigation, you must check with the FBI for details and what those charges are about; we are working on a completely different matter at this time.
Regardless,
Alex T. N.
US Army
1/9/2009 3:20:38 PM
Dear Hon. Mark Anthony Volante; (c/o Wenty K. Hasely, Court Assistance)
This will be the fifth letter to your court and the fifth time I will refer you to the Federal Bureau of Investigation regarding the investigation of a terror plot, local profiteering, a ten year investigation from Washington DC involving the 911 terror plots, corruption, revolving investigation of internal espionage by foreign governments, The State of New York, and various forms of pressure and harassment tactics. I cannot concentrate on this case if you refuse and continue to refuse contact with these parties; the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Buffalo, NY where I have asked for help to substantiate an ongoing investigation. When we close the case and apprehend those behind this; then this case can go forward; but until then we cannot sidetrack and jump on your ending when we have not there yet. What you are doing is trying to stop or end this prosecution and I will refer this case to the FBI with notice to them of a sixth letter to indicate the following.
1. An emergency situation and a national security crisis involving a terror plot
2. The involvement with and of the FBI which I am in communication with
3. Your refusal to suspend the intimidation or attempt to assault and harass myself in the past two years hindering this investigation; I have had to spend over 16 months in your court room for futile and trivial matters while not being able to express a severe problem on your end and my wishes to refer you to a federal prosecutor and the office of the FBI
4. My involvement in this is protected by any and all prosecutions relating to financial burdens; most especially when they are the cause of them or my service is used to prosecute and arrest a terror plot. You cannot keep sending me intimidating letters while we are interrogating and auditing those who are suspects in both a terror plot, 911, and twenty years of investigative work. You must stop or check with the protections of those who are engaged in this effort. You push and harass in a manner to suggest you wish some communication pertaining to this case or wish to block it, sidetrack it, or refuse to abide by the protection clauses I have indicated. This will be the sixth letter and you are not convincing we are close to making an arrest and solving this case.
This will be the sixth letter and while this is a federal case which has utmost jurisdiction; the same material must be sent to you every two months to ask you to contact the FBI or to suspend the pressures so that active or civilian personnel who are working with or for the government can prosecute those behind this terror plot and espionage effort. We are experts on this matter and exceed the talents of the FBI office in Buffalo, NY but you refuse to acknowledge or at least check with either them or a lawyer who is handling this case, Ann Coulter. The federal prosecutor for this case is Ann Coulter and if there is some information you need or wish to subpoena, she will be the contact until the case is closed. It is of utmost National Security and the jurisdiction is beyond what you are trying to instigate here. If you wish to communicate or present evidence to this particular case or terror plot, then please write it out in a clear and concise manner; which will aid in the arrest and prosecution of those behind it.
It does not seem as if you wish to listen to anyone or wish to stop the constant court order to delay, stop, sidetrack, or implicate guilt on those who are working on this. we must refer you to the office of the FBI to ask if you can politely stop until this case is concluded and to not constantly disrupt it with home invasions, court orders, request for money and funds, thousands of dollars in bond or bail, etc… it seems as though there is no stopping this and the pressure to end this investigation of a terror plot. There is a scare tactic every two months for the past two years and along with one home invasion which the FBI Buffalo office is investigating. If this is about corruption, please contact the FBI office; we cannot taint the other cases.
This is the sixth letter to address your “court orders” which is not powerful enough to stop this investigation or the prosecution and conclusion of it. at the same time, this has to be worrying enough to seek priority over a terror plot, further terror plot, and protections indicated in the last five letters to the court. As a former or active military personnel; we are sometimes gagged with the inability to explain in detail but refer you to the protection clauses in the third, fourth, and fifth letter. There is a federal law which clearly must be obeyed and it is there to protect against this sort of harassment and pressure. Please refer to letters three, four, and five and contact the FBI Buffalo office as I will ask them to substantiate an ongoing investigation and my involvement in it. I have contacted them for help and assistance in this matter and also indicated the horrific treatment we have gotten trying to defend the country and the constant harassment by hostile or corrupt forces involved. There are protections and this constant “tic for tat” and “back and forth” must stop while we focus on more important and life or death matters. This is a life or death matter and none of the protections have even been considered by this court. Your actions are bizarre if not irrational.
I will forward this letter to the FBI office Buffalo and ask them to refer you to a point of contact to assist in the matter; it is a matter of life and death. These protections are there for a reason, the Constitution is there also for a reason, please stop using it as a door mat to harass others or prevent a terror plot from escaping; to resolve this and seek prosecution, and we must preserve all evidence. Anything in the past ten years is evidence and forensics to a terror plot. We have submitted all evidence to the FBI and all federal prosecutors on this case including the harassment and home invasion incidences, if they are related or interwoven. We must stop checking in with this court as it is not a life and death situation but we must explain in detail and reveal aspects of this terror plot which can be detrimental to the final result.
Beyond the FBI and the protections indicated; we do not know what else will satisfy you; this is the sixth letter and it is a hostile effort for some reason yet known. We cannot conclude your case until the federal terror case is completed and resolved. We are working with the FBI and others on it. I am military personnel and am protected by the provisions of letter three, four and five. Why is this matter seeking priority over a life and death situation and one of national security? What are you trying to communicate so relevant to this case which we must ignore or stop in our tracks about? The following is clear and concise, yet the court is unable to understand it for some reason. Therefore, you must refer to the FBI office for a full explanation and a further education on how this federal clause is applied to terror plots and those investigating it.
On December 19, 2003, the President of the United States signed into law H.R. 100, the Service members Civil Relief Act. This law completely rewrites the Soldiers and Sailors Civil Relief Act of 1940, expanding many of the previous law's civil protections.
For the purposes of this Act:
(1) SERVICEMEMBER- The term `service member' means a member of the uniformed services, as that term is defined in section 101(a)(5) of title 10, United States Code.
(2) MILITARY SERVICE- The term `military service' means--
(A) in the case of a service member who is a member of the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, or Coast Guard--
(i) Active duty, as defined in section 101(d) (1) of title 10, United States Code, and
(ii) in the case of a member of the National Guard, includes service under a call to active service authorized by the President or the Secretary of Defense for a period of more than 30 consecutive days under section 502(f) of title 32, United States Code, for purposes of responding to a national emergency declared by the President and supported by Federal funds;
(B) in the case of a service member who is a commissioned officer of the Public Health Service or the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, active service; and
(C) Any period during which a service member is absent from duty on account of sickness, wounds, leave, or other lawful cause.
(3) PERIOD OF MILITARY SERVICE- The term `period of military service' means the period beginning on the date on which a service member enters military service and ending on the date on which the service member is released from military service or dies while in military service.
(4) DEPENDENT- The term `dependent', with respect to a service member, means--
(A) The service member’s spouse;
(B) The service member’s child (as defined in section 101(4) of title 38, United States Code); or
(C) An individual for whom the service member provided more than one-half of the individual's support for 180 days immediately preceding an application for relief under this Act.
(5) COURT- The term `court' means a court or an administrative agency of the United States or of any State (including any political subdivision of a State), whether or not a court or administrative agency of record.
(6) STATE- The term `State' includes--
(A) A commonwealth, territory, or possession of the United States; and
(B) The District of Columbia.
(7) SECRETARY CONCERNED- The term `Secretary concerned'--
(A) with respect to a member of the armed forces, has the meaning given that term in section 101(a)(9) of title 10, United States Code;
(B) with respect to a commissioned officer of the Public Health Service, means the Secretary of Health and Human Services; and
(C) With respect to a commissioned officer of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, means the Secretary of Commerce.
(8) MOTOR VEHICLE- The term `motor vehicle' has the meaning given that term in section 30102(a)(6) of title 49, United States Code.
The frustration of the matter has caused this to be referred to the FBI office so that line by line explanation and months of legal jockeying can be educational to the same end or result; we are working on a revolving case, the evidence must be preserved, it has all priority above any other case, and there are protections to ensure this is enforced and faithfully abided. Being the sixth letter, the poor quality of work and the legal ignorance must be referred to the FBI; there comes a point where we have to let people with more authority deal with life and death matters while those who are hostile reverse the effort. Being the sixth letter, it is clear the FBI must be contacted to explain what a terror plot is, what life and death is, what military personnel means, why protections are needed, and what to expect from federal authorities on this case. The frustration of having a home invasion and being arrested, having to dish out thousands in bond, and constant harassment and bickering; all has to be referred to the FBI Buffalo office. I will contact them and tell them to await your arrival or contact to discuss the case or why this is happening. It has to do with corruption and terror plots at both the federal and local level. If your department is involved in this investigation, you must check with the FBI for details and what those charges are about; we are working on a completely different matter at this time.
Regardless,
Alex T. N.
US Army
1/9/2009 3:20:38 PM
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
